Observational evidence of systematic deviations from homology
includes the following.
Burkert (1993) found that E galaxies in general were well fitted by the
r1/4 profile,
but that they nevertheless showed a small change of slope at some
point
in the profile (with
0.8-0.9
).
This change of slope was quantified by the parameter
.
It was found, that
was correlated with luminosity.
Caon et al. (1993)
fitted r1/n profiles and found n to correlate with
or L.
The values of n spanned a large range, from
n=0.5 at
= 0.3 kpc to
n=16 at
= 25 kpc.
Note, that none of these two studies explicitly take into account
whether the galaxy has a disk.
This is important since many E and S0 galaxies have disks
(e.g. JF94).
Hjorth & Madsen (1995)
used a model based on statistical mechanics of violent relaxation
to give a possible explanation of the result from Burkert (1993).
The one free parameter in their model is
the dimensionless central potential .
They found
to vary with
.
They also found that the FP tilt could be explained by a
variation of
with L, while keeping
constant,
and that the result from Burkert (i.e. that
varied with L)
supported this.
They did not address the question whether a fine tuning of the
-L
relation was needed to reproduce the small and constant thickness of the FP.
Note, that their model does not include any disk component.
The effect of a trend in the shape of the surface brightness profile was also studied by Ciotti et al. (1996). It was found that the FP slope could be explained in this way, but that a fine tuning was needed.
Renzini & Ciotti (1993) and
Ciotti et al. (1996)
also explored the effect of a trend in the relative
distribution within the galaxy of luminous and dark matter.
They parametrized this by the parameter
,
with r being the half mass radius of the given component.
They found, that a decrease in
could produce the FP tilt,
but that still fine tuning was needed.
Note, that a variation in
implies a variation in
(Eq.
), and thereby non-homology.
Djorgovski (1995)
found that an FP also existed for globular clusters.
When using the core parameters,
the FP coefficients
and
were found,
indicating structural homology and a constant (M/L) ratio.
When using half-light parameters,
the FP coefficients
and
were found,
similar to what is found for elliptical galaxies.
Also Nieto et al. (1990) and
Burstein et al. (1997)
found globular clusters to have similar FP coefficients
to those of giant elliptical galaxies
when using half-light parameters.
Djorgovski argued, that for globular clusters
this almost certainly implies non-homology,
and that this suggests that a similar explanation may be at work for
the elliptical galaxies.
The argumentation for the latter statement seems somewhat dubious.
Along those lines, Djorgovski later warns against assuming that
the similar half-light FPs for globular clusters and elliptical galaxies
reflect entirely the same physics.
Finally we mention, that Prugniel & Simien (1996) found that about half of the FP tilt was due to a trend in the global stellar population (age and/or metallicity), and that the other half could be accounted for by partly a trend in the amount of rotational support and partly a trend in spatial structure (as seen by Caon et al. 1993).
Properties of E and S0 Galaxies in the Clusters HydraI and Coma
Master's Thesis, University of Copenhagen, July 1997
Bo Milvang-Jensen (milvang@astro.ku.dk)