next up previous contents
Next: 9.6.1 The Uncertainty on Up: 9. Details of the Previous: 9.5.1 The Extra Correction

   
9.6 Flat Fields

A number of sky and dome flats had been taken, as listed in Table [*]. Additional data, such as exposure time and level, can be found in Table [*], [*], and [*], although the ordering of the images in the JB and JU tables is not chronological, i.e. the dfsc numbers can not be inferred from them.


 
Table: The Available Photometry Flat Fields
Type Filter #frames dfsc numbers night(s)
Sky flat Gunn r 14 1362-1364, 1498-1501, 2175-2181 1, 2, 7
Sky flat Johnson B 14 1365-1366, 1502-1505, 2048-2052, 2182-2184 1, 2, 6, 7
Sky flat Johnson U 16 1367-1369, 1506-1510, 2053-2056, 2185-2188 1, 2, 6, 7
Sky flat Johnson V 0    
Dome flat Gunn r 10 1808-1817 5
Dome flat Johnson B 10 1670-1679 4
Dome flat Johnson U 20 1649-1668 4
Dome flat Johnson V 14 2515-2528 11
 

The 44 sky flats were corrected for bias, dark, shutter, and fat zero. The images from before the CCD temperature change (i.e. the flat fields from night 1 and 2) did not get the extra fat zero correction, since it was not known at that time.

A thorough comparison of the flat fields from the different nights showed, that they were not the same, there were gradients in their quotients. While the flats within night 2+ (i.e. night 2, 6, and 7) agreed well (within 0.2% in GR and < 0.1% in JB and JU), the agreement between night 2+ and night 1 was not good, 0.4% in GR and 0.15% in JB and JU. Therefore it was decided to make one set (GR, JB, JU) of flats for night 1, and one set for night 2+.

In each of the 3 filters, the images from night 1 and 2+ were combined separately (weighting by the level in the images, and using a 2 sigma clipping) into a night 1 and 2+ flat, respectively. Care was taken that objects (stars) did not make it to the combined flat.

Since the night 1 flats are made from only 2 or 3 images, the noise in them are too big. Therefore we do the following: we assume, that the pixel-to-pixel variation does not change from night 1 to 2+, but only the large-scale variation. We therefore make the 3 quotients between the night 1 and the night 2+ flats, and fit the large-scale pattern in this using a many piece (6 in x and 10 in y) cubic spline. This fit is then multiplied with the flat from night 2+, thereby getting flats with the pixel-to-pixel variation from night 2+, and the large-scale variation from night 1.



 
next up previous contents
Next: 9.6.1 The Uncertainty on Up: 9. Details of the Previous: 9.5.1 The Extra Correction

Properties of E and S0 Galaxies in the Clusters HydraI and Coma
Master's Thesis, University of Copenhagen, July 1997

Bo Milvang-Jensen (milvang@astro.ku.dk)